See exactly what you're getting

Hi {{first_name}},

Quick question — when a sprint derails at {{company}}, how long does it take your team to surface it and replan?

Most EM teams I talk to lose 4–6 hours a week just on status meetings, stand-up prep, and chasing updates across Slack threads and Jira comments.

We built Flowdeck specifically for engineering managers who are tired of project visibility being a manual job.

It syncs with your existing stack (GitHub, Jira, Linear), surfaces blockers before they become delays, and gives you a live burndown that doesn't require anyone to update a spreadsheet.

Teams like Vercel, Retool, and Loom use it to cut planning overhead by 40% and ship 30% faster.

Would it be worth a 20-minute walkthrough to see if the numbers hold for {{company}}'s setup?

— Alex
Flowdeck | alex@flowdeck.io

Hi {{first_name}},

Wanted to follow up with something concrete rather than just bump my last note.

I looked at {{company}}'s engineering blog and noticed you're running roughly 2-week sprints with a distributed team. That's exactly the setup where Flowdeck tends to have the most visible impact.

The specific problem it solves: when 3–4 engineers are working on dependent tickets, delays compound invisibly until stand-up — by which point you've already lost half a day.

Flowdeck flags dependency conflicts 24 hours in advance and pings the right people automatically. No more finding out at 9am that two engineers have been blocked since yesterday afternoon.

One customer (a 90-person SaaS in Berlin) saved 11 hours of engineering time per sprint just from this single feature.

Happy to send a short video demo if that's easier than a call — no calendar juggling needed.

— Alex

{{first_name}},

There's a hidden cost in every engineering team that rarely shows up in retrospectives: EM time.

The average engineering manager spends 12–15 hours per week on coordination work — project status updates, unblocking engineers, preparing reports for leadership, fielding interruptions.

That's time not spent on architectural decisions, hiring, or actually growing your people.

Flowdeck was built to absorb that coordination overhead. You get automatic status reports, real-time project health signals, and a leadership dashboard that answers the "where are we?" question before it gets asked.

The goal isn't to replace your process — it's to get you 6 hours a week back.

If that sounds worth exploring: {{cal_link}}

— Alex

{{first_name}},

I don't want to keep pinging you if it's not relevant — so honest question:

Is shipping velocity and sprint visibility genuinely a pain point for your team right now, or is it handled well enough that it's not on your radar?

If it's the former, I'd love to show you what we've built.
If it's the latter, I'll stop here and wish you smooth sprints.

Either way, totally fine — just say the word.

— Alex
Flowdeck

{{first_name}},

Last email, I promise.

I wanted to leave you with something useful regardless of whether Flowdeck is the right fit right now.

Here's a 3-question sprint health check I share with every EM I talk to:

1. Can anyone on your team tell you — right now, without checking Slack — which tickets are at risk of missing this sprint?
2. Does your leadership team ever ask you for a status update that you have to manually compile?
3. In your last 5 sprints, how many had at least one "surprise" blocker that wasn't visible until it was already a problem?

If the answer to any of those is uncomfortable, we should talk. Flowdeck was built specifically to flip all three.

If not — genuinely, keep doing what's working. Good luck with the next sprint.

— Alex
alex@flowdeck.io | flowdeck.io